Poncho As I mentioned a few days ago, this year are lagging organic than ever and it seems that nobody dares to close programs and contract farms to make some profit to them.
is a fact that the English hunting has become a profitable business for many for a lot of years and that the economic bubble we had in this country has facilitated the degradation of this modality and the fact riding has become in the eyes of a large percentage of society as an activity for people with a lot of money going out in their huge SUVs to look for heads to hang in their offices or strident "chaleses" outside of the capital.
This fact as I said, has helped to undermine the hunt, weaken to the point that what the "customer" buying is a guarantee to the quality of the trophy, a guarantee of the outcome of his three hours in a turret right prepared, a guarantee of your living room that day will be a little less empty, in the same proportion as their full time portfolio.
few days ago arrived in my mail an email from an "organic" by presenting its program for the 2011-2012 season.
mail in question was accompanied by an annoying powerpoint presentation where you could see tremendous flocks of pigs with tremendous defense and a handful of lords fund of not more than 20 people. These gentlemen guaranteed the number of males that were to abate, the number of cattle and to the number of metal!
the camps have always been high-level, has always been and will be people who do not mind paying money to experiment with such a pleasant experience, and hopefully the people there are still because it moves the country, creates jobs and meets a key role within a developed society. But, gentlemen, that is not at the expense of English hunting, if there are people who enjoy this type of game seems perfect to me where in order ethical and legal, but please do not call it hunting, not hunting call English, because it is not.
One could talk for hours about what is ethical, that is unethical. Where is the boundary between some pot or not, I will summarize in one word: uncertainty. That's the hunt, there is a difference, not in emotion, in the fenced acres, the density, no one would have to analyze each case to me is the excitement of knowing you're in the middle of the mountains and you can be lucky enough to kill a large vein, or if you enter two small or your gate is not taken and do not see anything.
One could talk for hours about what is ethical, that is unethical. Where is the boundary between some pot or not, I will summarize in one word: uncertainty. That's the hunt, there is a difference, not in emotion, in the fenced acres, the density, no one would have to analyze each case to me is the excitement of knowing you're in the middle of the mountains and you can be lucky enough to kill a large vein, or if you enter two small or your gate is not taken and do not see anything.
This inevitable debate in the world of hunting today leads me to think of a second derivative. No punishment that are discussed in my opinion, wrongly called hunting barbaric as killing 60 male pigs on 100 hectares for 10 guns, but instead whether it is the fact that a man has a parcel on the mountain two horses grazing and it is denounced by animal abuse as it was raining and the horses had a wet blanket over the back, if an owner is liable to prune oaks 6 more than he had Condec and is terminated, if justiciable which sanees a dry oak, if you are fined because you made a reservoir for cattle with room for more than 10,000 liters which granted you (and if you want you still counting) is punishable if a parent is with his 14 years in a brace Cabezaparda (for example) and after leaving the father to meet a cow show you how and how expect, aim, calm down, assess, remove the safety and shoot after years of accompanying and seeing how things should be done. Now that's a crime because there are two weapons or because they are bending or because it is, please! 
0 comments:
Post a Comment